AS the author of the previously printed letter to the editor re river bank erosion, I feel I should respond to Sandra Connor (January 27) where this author possibly should take more note of the several points that were made in my article.
I point out to her that I do not accuse wake boats of being the only factor causing river bank erosion.
Of course everyone knows that floods and high water flows aid in this problem and these factors have caused erosion since the beginning of time.
However, I and many other river users note and report to me that wake boat wash is the major contributor to bank erosion since these vessels were introduced to our area in the not too distant past.
The studies mentioned by Sandra Connor were Echuca-based, and in my article I specifically made Sunraysia readers aware of the problems here, and not in the Echuca area.
She would of course know that the Murray River is much narrower in that area than in the Sunraysia area.
Also I believe wake boats were virtually unheard of in our area at the time of that study.
So I completely dismiss the findings of that study with regards to wake boat operation in our area.
I agree that wind caused waves and river flows attribute to bank erosion, but must point out to Sandra Connor that wind does not usually cause waves to break up to a distance of a metre or more up the bank from the water line.
I am led to believe that the bigger the wake waves created by the vessel, the better the wake board riders like it.
So don’t try to tell me that wake boat drivers with wake boarders in tow do not try to achieve the maximum waves for their towed board riders. Nor does wind usually buffet moored houseboats against the mooring as the relentless pounding by wake boat created waves.
And as quoted “high speed recreational boating contributes to bank erosion” , however Sandra Connor will surely concede that wake boats used for recreational purposes travel at a much lower speed to a “high speed recreational boat”, thus creating their excessive wash, which is defined “wash that may endanger other vessels or causes nuisance to other people- e.g. a spilled cup of coffee”.
I do not suggest that wake boats be banned from use in our area, but that areas be defined as for their use be instigated.
Once such areas are defined, any other vessel entering that area should have no grounds for complaint against those wake boat drivers.
It still seems to me that the only action available to complainants is to report all instances of excessive wash to the local boating officer NSW Maritime and local government authorities and maybe eventually such areas may be designated and solve the problems.
By this action, pressure will be put directly to the local authorities and indicate their acknowledgement of our problems.
No action by them will indicate their acceptance of this form of river bank erosion!
Might I finally suggest Sandra Connor and other wake boat operators spend time on a moored houseboat and experience the buffeting and bank wash created by vessels such as their own.
Only then will they be able to comprehend both sides of this important discussion and provide me with satisfactory explanations for not having these specifically designated areas for their nuisance vessels.
Les Hartley, Curlwaa.